Sindikat IFJ-a podržava novinare u akciji protiv zakonskih propisa koji u pitanje dovode pravo na rad

14.11.2005.

14November2005

  

IFJ Unions Back Journalists in Day of Action Over Australia’s Legal Threat to Rights At Work

 

 The International Federation of Journalists today warned that the plans of the Australian government to introduce repressive new industrial relations’ legislation will dramatically undermine the stability and quality of workers’ rights in journalism and turn the clock back to “an age of intolerance in the workplace when press freedom is compromised by social injustice.”

Tomorrow the IFJ and its member unions around the world will join global protests over new laws that represent drastic cuts in existing rights of union representation, collective bargaining, minimum employment standards and protection from unfair dismissal.

“These plans if they become law will extinguish a tradition of fairness at work that has lasted for generations,” saidAidan White, IFJ General Secretary. “At the same time it will create a new vulnerability in the newsroom, undermining the social and professional status of journalists and putting unacceptable pressure on quality of media content and journalism.”

The IFJ and its member unions are contacting Australian diplomatic missions around the world in co-operation with other global union federations tomorrow following a call for solidarity from the Australian Council of Trade unions.

“Journalists all over the world will be concerned at what is happening in Australia where the government appears determined to turn the clock back,” said Aidan White. “When press freedom is compromised by social injustice in the workplace e it is a tragedy for journalism and for demo

Key parts of the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Bill 2005 includes setting just five minimum conditions set down by government covering minimum wages, basic holiday, parental and carers’ leave, and hours arrangements that will not guarantee penalties for excessive overtime. Other previously negotiated arrangements in collective agreements may be abandoned. The new rules will also:

·        Remove protection from unfair dismissal for all workers in workplaces employing less than 100 workers and pushing workers onto individual employment contracts;

·        Place heavy restrictions on trade union activities, including on the right to talk with workers in their workplace;

·        Impose extremely narrow limits on the matters which can be the subject of collective bargaining.  Unions can be fined $30,000 if they seek to reach agreement with employers on unfair dismissal, union training leave, use of subcontractors and a range of other matters;

·        Remove the right to public holidays for many workers, and weakened provisions for annual leave;

·        Allow the government to stop industrial action if it decides the action is detrimental to the economy, and legal provisions concerning industrial action will be heavily biased in favour of employers.

 

The IFJ’s affiliate in Australia, the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance says the proposed changes could dramatically reduce protection for members’ working rights. The union plans to campaign for an extension to current agreements to allow them to continue to operate under current legislation. The union aims to target agreements that expire during 2006 so that they can include some matters barred under the new legislation, they can embrace all existing award clauses and to prevent them from being terminated unilaterally by the employer at the expiry of the agreement.

 

“Australia’s great industrial relations traditions are being threatened by a doctrinaire government that is intent to weakening the rights of employed workers,” said White. “When this happens in media it will undermine morale in the workforce, create an unfair balance in favour of employers’ interests and in the process it will undermine the capacity   for independent and vigorous journalism.”

 

  

Draft Letter for Journalists’ unions

The list of Australian missions is available online: http://www.dfat.gov.au/missions/missions.txt

The Hon. John Howard MP

Prime Minister of Australia

Parliament House

Canberra ACT 2600

AUSTRALIA

Fax: (612) 6273 4100

Dear Prime Minister,

Rights of Journalists and Media Staff under Proposed Workplace Laws

I am writing on behalf of [NAME OF YOUR ORGANISATION] to express grave concern over your Government’s plans for drastic changes to workplace laws.  We believe that these changes would do significant harm to Australia ’s reputation and standing in the international community.

Australia’s great industrial relations traditions are being threatened by a doctrinaire approach to industrial relations which is intent upon weakening the rights of employed workers. When this happens in media it will undermine morale in the workforce, create an unfair balance in favour of employers’ interests and in the process it will undermine the capacity   for independent and vigorous journalism.

We are greatly alarmed, in particular, at proposals for abolishing protection from unfair dismissal for some 4 million workers employed in companies with less than 100 employees. This is discriminatory and will lead to companies re-structuring their operations in order to escape legal obligations.

Your government’s proposal to keep unions out of workplaces would further undermine the right of workers to bargain collectively with their employer, and contravenes ILO Convention 98.  Australia already stands in breach of this fundamental Convention, and the planned new legislation will increase the gap between Australian law and the country’s international obligations.

In addition, we are concerned that:

• By reducing allowable matters in awards to only 5 conditions, many workers will lose important entitlements such as weekend, shift and public holiday rates of pay;
•  
• By ensuring that more workers are forced onto individual contracts, workers who do not wish to sign such contracts will be intimidated through fear of dismissal.

These proposals are of particular concern to journalists and media staff and may have a detrimental impact on the capacity of journalists to work in protected social conditions that are needed for journalism to flourish.

We also believe they will place Australia in further breach of the fundamental international labour standards established by ILO Conventions, whose ratification and implementation should form the basis of all countries’ industrial relations policies. If implemented, the proposed changes would leave Australia at the bottom of OECD countries with respect to protection of basic workers’ rights.

Over the last month, the Australian people have shown great popular opposition to these proposals. We urge you to give proper consideration to their concerns, and abandon your proposals in the interests of the Australian people. We are deeply concerned at these proposals and pledge our full support to the Media Arts and Entertainment Alliance and the Australian Council of Trade Unions and their members in opposing these plans.

Yours faithfully,

 

Povratak